Justification for Item Count
The provided excerpt from Rule 1 was analyzed to determine an appropriate number of test items to ensure substantial coverage without excessive redundancy. The analysis yielded the following breakdown:
- Main Sections Analyzed: 6 (Sections 1 through 6)
- Sub-sections with distinct concepts: 3 (Section 3a, 3b, 3c)
- Distinct Legal Concepts Identified: 18
- Title of the Rules (Sec. 1)
- General applicability to courts (Sec. 2)
- Supreme Court's power to provide exceptions (Sec. 2)
- Scope: actions & special proceedings (Sec. 3)
- Definition of a civil action (Sec. 3a)
- Types of civil actions (ordinary/special) (Sec. 3a)
- Governing rules for both civil action types (Sec. 3a)
- Definition of a criminal action (Sec. 3b)
- Definition of a special proceeding (Sec. 3c)
- Enumeration of inapplicable cases (Sec. 4)
- Exception to inapplicability (analogy/suppletory) (Sec. 4)
- Condition for the exception (practicable/convenient) (Sec. 4)
- Commencement of a civil action (Sec. 5)
- Commencement for an additional defendant (Sec. 5)
- Effect of motion denial on commencement (Sec. 5)
- Rule of liberal construction (Sec. 6)
- Objective of construction (just, speedy, inexpensive) (Sec. 6)
- Scope of construction objective (every action/proceeding) (Sec. 6)
Recommended Item Count: Based on the 18 distinct concepts, a baseline of 18 questions was established. To achieve Bar-level difficulty, several complex concepts (e.g., Sec. 4's dual exceptions, Sec. 5's rule on additional defendants) were tested with multiple nuanced items. This resulted in a final count of 24 items, which falls within the specified 20-40 range and provides robust coverage of the material.