Codal Analysis for Quiz Generation
This analysis justifies the number of items created for the quiz based on the provided excerpt of Rule 6, Sections 5-7.
- Main Sections Analyzed: 3 (Sections 5, 6, 7)
- Sub-sections Analyzed: 2 (Section 5(a), 5(b))
- Distinct Legal Concepts Identified:
- Section 5 (Defenses): 16 concepts (Negative defense definition; Affirmative defense definition; Hypothetical admission principle; 10 enumerated examples like fraud, payment, etc.; "Confession and avoidance" catch-all; 3 dismissal grounds like lack of jurisdiction).
- Section 6 (Counterclaim): 1 concept (General definition of a counterclaim).
- Section 7 (Compulsory Counterclaim): 7 concepts (Cognizable by regular courts; Same transaction/occurrence connection; Rule on third parties; Jurisdictional rules on amount/nature; RTC amount exception; Consequence of being barred if not raised; Exception to the barred rule).
- Total Distinct Concepts: 24
- Reasoning for Item Count: The 24 distinct concepts provide a strong foundation for a comprehensive quiz. To test nuances, exceptions, and boundary language (e.g., "may" vs. "shall," specific phrasing), the item count was expanded to 28 questions. This count substantially covers the source material and falls within the required 20-40 item range, ensuring a rigorous assessment.